Re: Two Possible Film Projects NOT Coming a Theater Near You Other than you folks here, I sent the Synopsis and Outline to my two research associates in LA and they say movie forward with the movie, only they suggest it be called
SEXUALLY INCORRECT
Can Men and Women Build a Better Future Together?
The synopsis and outline are not going to female research associates.
Re: SEXUALLY INCORRECT -- Can Men and Women Build a Better Future Together? If men and women are naturally monogamous, why do they spend $97 billion a year creating and watching porn?
Re: SEXUALLY INCORRECT -- Can Men and Women Build a Better Future Together? I guess, since 70% of Americans are medicated to the point they can't confront the opposite sex for sex, they just sit at home or the computer and watch porn or they convince themselves they don't want sex anyway. If so this is true, why make a movie about the subject?
But note: this thread has the most views on this site -- 221 at this date -- yet only 3 people, other than myself, the OP, have had the courage to offer any commentary.
What does that say when 98.65% of YOU people reading this thread (3 of 221) are afraid to post? It shows that SEX is a big hidden iceberg floating around society causing all manner of hidden strife and disasters?
It shows that everyone is interested in the subject -- for obvious reasons -- but no one wants to confront the problems attendant to the subject -- problems like:
1) Fact that homo sapiens is related to the bonobo thus NOT monogamous;
2) Fact that prostitution is illegal so women have no recourse to protections under law when raped or trafficked;
3) State interferes with sex through marriage license, formerly the F.U.C.K. License of kings;
4) Today's longevity makes no sexual diversity until death a contract of adhesion;
5) Divorce is big business the state and lawyers want to keep in place;
6) 70% are on Big Pharma's libido killing drugs;
7) Nonexistent or unhappy sex life is probably number one cause of health problems, mass murder and suicide in society;
8) Destruction of relationships and the family unit are used by cultural Marxists attempting to destroy the middle class hence the engine of a capitalism.
PRIMA NOCTA -- Very Suppressed Subject Prima nocta -- the legal right of a monarch to have sex with any female subject in the Kingdom, particularly on her wedding night.
If this happened, why is it so hard to posit the words Fornication Under Command of the King are not the basis upon which the well-know acronym was built?
Re: SEXUALLY INCORRECT -- PRIMA NOCTA I have talked to several scholars about this -- as well as about Michel Foucault's book entitled, THE HISTORY OF SEXUALITY -- and people on the Left and the Right go bananas over this subject as well as the subject dealing with monogamy as discussed in SEX AT DAWN.
The greater subject subject emerging in my mind is:
HOW DO POWER CENTERS IN HUMAN CIVILIZATION TREAT SEXUALITY AND THE DISCOURSE THEREOF IN LIGHT OF THE TRUE NATURE OF HOME SAPIENS, IF ANY.
This study brings in not only royalty and the doctrine of PRIMA NOCTA but the saga of JEFFREY EPSTEIN and pedophilia island where actual royalty, Prince Andrews, to this day allegedly occasioned. In other words, how does the power elite -- from King Henry the VIII to Prince Andrew, Duke of York, obtain sex and special "drugs" like under 18 year old women.
How does all this relate to state-sanctioned prostitution and drugs?
Why does the state REALLY keep both prostitution and drugs illegal?
Did the Mossad set up Jeffrey Epstein on the island to compromise elites?
Why is the Mainstream Media not talking about this?
Did the CONTROL GROUP of the Mainstream Media occasion Jeffrey's island?
Should the power elite be able to screw whoever it wants -- after all it's the "power elite" and they are very busy people?