Runboard.com
You're welcome.

runboard.com       Sign up (learn about it) | Sign in (lost password?)

 
James Jaeger Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user
Global user

Registered: 12-2017
Reply | Quote
More Americans NOT Having Sex


Greg Gutfeld had a show last night -- 1/6/19 --where he said a new study found that young people are having less sex.

Almost 30% of men 18 - 30 years old reporting no sex in 2018.

Almost 20% of women 18 - 30 years old reporting no sex in 2018.

[sign in to see URL]


Any theories?

Last edited by James Jaeger, 4/7/2019, 7:28 pm
4/7/2019, 7:14 pm Link to this post PM James Jaeger Blog
 
James Jaeger Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user
Global user

Registered: 12-2017
Reply | Quote
Re: More Americans NOT Having Sex


So here are the theories for no sex and my evaluation. Horse = not true, true = true, maybe = maybe.


1) hookup culture - horse

2) crushing economic pressures - true

3) surging anxiety rates - horse

4) psychological frailty -- horse

5) widespread antidepressant use - true

6) streaming television -- horse

7) environmental estrogens leaked by plastics -- maybe

8) dropping testosterone levels -- maybe

9) digital porn -- true

10) vibrator’s golden age -- true

10A Plenthora of sex toys - true

11) dating apps - horse

12) option paralysis - horse

13) helicopter parents - horse

14) careerism - factor

15) smartphones - horse

16) the news cycle - horse

17) information overload -- horse

18) sleep deprivation -- maybe

19) obesity - maybe

20) poor physical fittness due to sitting at computers -- true

21) fewer potential partners around - true

22) fear of disease - true

23) fear of pregnancy - true

24) loss of sexual momentum due to aids

25) the reaction to WWII has worn off


Last edited by James Jaeger, 4/7/2019, 7:49 pm
4/7/2019, 7:33 pm Link to this post PM James Jaeger Blog
 
James Jaeger Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user
Global user

Registered: 12-2017
Reply | Quote
Re: More Americans NOT Having Sex


Some thoughts on the suggested reasons.

1) hookup culture - You would think that would make it easier to have sex.

2) crushing economic pressures - This is probably a major factor. When you are starving and have no money it's difficult to get a hard on.

3) surging anxiety rates - This would come from alcohol use. Alcohol makes one anxious the third day after consumption.

4) psychological frailty -- Maybe, with the school system and media turning men into women.

5) widespread antidepressant use - Big problem. Scientific American mag says 1 in 6 are on psych drugs and the shrinks themselves say psych drugs lower libido.

6) streaming television -- Don't see how this would ax sex.

7) environmental estrogens leaked by plastics -- maybe. Don't know enough about.

8) dropping testosterone levels -- maybe

9) digital porn -- Easy availability of porn can act as a substitute for the real thing. But porn can also stimulate one to get out and find a partner. Also, there is an educational dimension to porn -- one can learn new positions and techniques through porn.

10) vibrator’s golden age -- I think this is a woman's porn, her vibrator.

10A Plenthora of sex toys - Operate like porn.

11) dating apps - Almost all internet dating sites are slanted to benefit the woman and rape the man. Also, why would a woman who has the goods what to show them off in 2D when she can access 3D.

12) option paralysis - No idea.

13) helicopter parents - Stupid suggestion.

14) careerism - Maybe, people who are afraid of sex might "bury themselves in their work."

15) smartphones - Texting on smartphones is an excellent way to engage in conversations and set up dates. I don't see how a modest use of this technology can't be helpful.

16) the news cycle - horse

17) information overload -- horse

18) sleep deprivation -- maybe. How can you !@#$ if you you are asleep.

19) obesity - maybe. If you're too fat to !@#$ that what do you do? Hit the gym.

20) poor physical fitness due to sitting at computers -- true. This probably does lower libido. Sexual activity is a manifestation of health. Conversely, people who don't !@#$ are more likely to be unhealthy mentally and/or physically.

21) fewer potential partners around - true. The BabyBoomers had many more potential partners than today's kids.

22) fear of disease - true. Aids killed the First Sexual Revolution in 1985.
 
23) fear of pregnancy - true. Major problem especially for women who don't want to take the pill or get abortions. Condoms kill at least 50% of sexual stimulation -- for the man -- so they are a horrible form of birth control -- but women like them because they don't give a !@#$ if the guy can't feel anything.
   
24) loss of sexual momentum due to aids. Major problem.

25) the reaction to WWII has worn off. Significant.

 

Last edited by James Jaeger, 4/25/2019, 12:03 am
4/25/2019, 12:03 am Link to this post PM James Jaeger Blog
 
James Jaeger Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user
Global user

Registered: 12-2017
Reply | Quote
Re: More Americans NOT Having Sex


It is disconcerting to see males and females in anything less than sweet and tender harmony. Unfortunately this is not what we see on the dating circuit for no where is the battlefield more brutal. Fortunately it doesn't have to be this way if men and woman follow a few simple principles.

A first date should be over drinks, not over coffee or at dinner. No one wants to try and get to know someone while they are on a coffee buzz. Dates over coffee are like job interviews under stress of money. No one is able to be them self at a job interview or a coffee date. So ladies, wise up: if you want to get to know that man you are spending some of your precious time on, meet him for a happy hour. It only takes an hour and one or two drinks to know if you are going to click with someone. If you are not going to click, say goodbye after an hour. It will be easy. If you are going to click, the hour will go by very fast. Keep talking and even have dinner.

Always have an open schedule when you commit for a date.

If the happy hour goes well, you will want to spend additional time having additional drinks or dinner. If dinner goes well you will want to spend some more time dancing or even going to another club or place. The point is: a proper date is a date whereby the parties make it easy and possible to get to know each other. After all, why are you dating in the first place? You are hopefully dating to find a long-term, compatible partner that you can eventually become monogamous with and explore life -- physically, mentally and spiritually. You took time to shower, groom, put in contacts, dress and maybe even more time if you bought clothes and/or went to a hair salon. Perhaps 2 or more hours to prep for a date. So why go on a date if you do NOT provide yourself with an open schedule.

The actual date -- unless it is aborted at the happy hour level due to incompatibility -- should be at least 6 hours long. Again, it should take only a happy hour from 5 to 6 to decide if there is a possibility. If there is a possibility, you should rejoice because this is a wonderful and important thing and you should not cut it short. !@#$ the rest of the world. !@#$ your job, !@#$ getting home early to feed the dog, !@#$ the fact that you have to get up early for an exercise class. !@#$ all the demands on you. And turn off your !@#$ cell phone -- you are on a date. This should be your attitude. And with this attitude you should be willing to throw caution to the wind and have a good time. If this means having some drinks, dinner and dance, do it. If it means painting the town, making out in the back seat of a car or even getting a room -- do it. Life is short, time is precious.

These things said, I can already hear some women screaming when I said 'get a room." Yes, I am advocating that one does NOT avoid having sex on a first date if bilateral chemistry is present. Consider this. In order for you to be a couple with anyone, you are going to have to eventually have sex. No? Who wants to commit to a "sexual" relationship -- or any male-female relationship -- unless there is some proven sexual compatibility. Everyone sits around these days and endlessly talks and texts about sex, but where's the physical proof of anything? This is what "dates" are for: to verify sexual compatibility thus opening the door to qualifying for other, more complex compatibilities.

So to put it bluntly: sex is the easiest part to figure out in a potential male-female relationship but the most important. How many people have broken up, gotten separated or divorced because they are not satisfied with their spouse or never were sexually compatible in the first place? Millions, if not hundreds of millions or billions.

Society -- due to the religious influence of prudes and governments -- has men and women doing stupid things like, avoiding sex until the third or fourth date. The twisted idea must be that -- if the man can tolerate the woman's crappy personality and bitchy, selfish and entitled manners until a third or fourth date -- then he gets sex as a reward. In other words, Society has configured the convention of dating to be little more than "carrot and stick" exercise designed to corral men into the marriage pit of eventual a-sexuality. Society thus positions the “date” as an incriminating activity, whereby any decent man who has been on three or more dates, should be ashamed of himself if he !@#$ the woman and then doesn't stay with her or marry her. And women complain about this all the time. "He's a pig," meaning that he fucked me and then he dumped me. So let's take a look at this, since this seems to be the crux of the problem.

Men and women, whether Marxist society likes it or not, are in competition with each other. Put bluntly, some women are crappy in bed. They lie there like a dead fish and let the man do all the work. Then when he doesn't call up for a fifth date -- where he again gets to pay for everything -- the woman calls him a "pig" and the woman's "friends" call her a "slut" for sleeping with him in the first place. This is the Society we live in today, a society of the false accusation of "pig" and "slut."

And men can be just as bad, because many, if not most, men are crappy in bed. Have you ever watch any porn? The Net is replete with porn whereby men have no idea how to perform the sexual act, especially with women. Besides failing to provide adequate, if any, foreplay, such men bang a woman until they cum, but she does not. Then they roll over and go to sleep or smoke. Other men have no rhythm. When she pushes, he pulls and when she pulls, he pushes. Shouldn't a man and a woman, who have proper chemistry, be in rhythm singing the same song while having sex at least? She pushes, he pushes. She pulls, he pulls. They go together. They are in synch, their genitals are dancing with each other harmoniously and deeply. They are not only “!@#$,” they are “making love.” To discover all these nuances is what a date is for. But if these discoveries are postponed until the Nth date, look at all the wasted time, not to mention the fact that the couple was probably heading for a disaster it could have headed off.

Continued ...



Last edited by James Jaeger, 5/12/2019, 2:03 pm
5/12/2019, 2:02 pm Link to this post PM James Jaeger Blog
 
James Jaeger Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user
Global user

Registered: 12-2017
Reply | Quote
Re: More Americans NOT Having Sex


Continued ...

Ladies, don't you want to find a man that gives you wonderful foreplay, !@#$ with beautiful rhythm and then makes sure you cum as much and many times as possible, with or without him? Why wait until the third or fourth date to qualify a man? In today's dating world -- after the dating couple has scrutinized every aspect of each others personality, education, associations, health records, financials, tax returns, family tree and done almost a compete estate plan and pre-nuptial agreement -- they STILL haven't FUCKED each other to see if they have ANY chemistry! What's wrong with THAT picture, Society's plan for today's dating couples?! The remedy: get the sex out of the way first. You are in competition with every other woman on the plaNet so prove you are good, and prove it fast. And find out if he sucks. He very well may suck and not deserve your pussy. But if you suck at sex, why should the man be expected to show you his financials and propose anything? If you, on the other hand, are !@#$ incredible at sex -- the man will be begging to show you his financials, and you will have the option of staying or moving on.

So what's the moral of the dating story? It's that both men and women should mix and match as much and as quickly as possible. Just because the sex is bad with Man A doesn't mean it will be bad with Man B. Just because Woman A is a dead fish doesn't mean Woman B will be a dead fish. Different people bring out different dances with each other. So don't relegate discovery to the third or fourth date to figure out if the sex is going to be great or horrible. Be willing to find out sooner rather than later. Don't use sex as a reward, carrot or a political weapon. Treat sex as its own quid pro quo and enjoy it freely, like you did when you were a teenager. If a guy !@#$ you, or you !@#$ him, and then you never hear from him again, consider the possibility that you simply weren't that great in bed. Hit the gym, watch more porn and/or enroll at Sex University. Don't call him a "pig." And never allow your "friends" to call you a "slut." Smack the !@#$ out of them and then unfriend them. And if you're guy don't be one of these assholes that !@#$ a woman who is perfectly good in all respects just so you can get another notch on your penis. The only way women can really neutralize guys like this to become so good in bed they CAN'T leave -- and then YOU leave them.

So the anatomy of a proper date includes economizing on time, focusing on the most important aspect of a relationship and then, from there, the groundwork for a serious friendship is laid. No pun intended. And ladies remember what a wise man in the hills once said: "If you won't !@#$ a man, you won't FRIEND a man." For a man, !@#$ -- especially serious !@#$ -- leads to friendship. So stop trying to get him to be your friend if you won't even !@#$ him. Sure, you have a personality, intelligence and you're a live human being and all that. But remember, he has his male friends that also have all that. You are a female. You have different qualities, but the main quality that differentiates you from his male friends is you have a pussy. Food is NOT the gateway to a man's heart, pussy is the gateway to a man's heart. Food just makes a man fat, exactly what church-ridden prudes and nun-infested society want so married couples stay together because they have become so fat and unattractive to everyone else they have no options. Sex is the way to a man's heart and it starts with dating experience that recognizes this. Anthropologists tell us that over homo sapiens’ past 195,000-year existence, sex has been used more for bonding than reproduction. Modern society has twisted and warped this truth in order to conform with the perversions of the Church and State -- but this is another story.

The story of dating should and can be an exciting story if one considers the anatomy of a successful date. Men and woman can and should have fun with each other without limits. They should respect each other for the gifts that each can bring to a relationship whether such relationship is pre- or post-carnal. If this respect grows in a society it will only be natural that affinity and sexual relationships between men and women will also grow. Be a pig and a slut for good sex, especially on your first date.

If more Americans had proper dates ... more more Americans would have good sex.

Last edited by James Jaeger, 5/12/2019, 2:05 pm
5/12/2019, 2:02 pm Link to this post PM James Jaeger Blog
 
James Jaeger Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user
Global user

Registered: 12-2017
Reply | Quote
Re: More Americans NOT Having Sex


Sexbots are going to reconfigure the entire competitive landscape of not only the sex industry, but the male-female relationship itself.

As noted in the article, Real_women today are better than Sexbots because:

"... they offer a lot more than merely a physical encounter; they offer an emotional connection and authentic human intimacy."

This may be true, however this quote also contains the seeds of the future of the industry, and such future can be summed up in one sentence: WOMEN WILL HAVE TO STOP BEING NAGGING !@#$ WITH ENDLESS DEMANDS AND LEARN HOW TO !@#$ AND PLEASE.

In other words, Real_women will eventually lose out physically to the Sexbots so they will have to compensate with other charms and services. When Real_women are not be able to compete with semi-intelligent, vibrating SuperSexbots in the physical arena, they will be forced to compete with them in personality and personal services. What might this look like in the real world? Easiest answer: longer term, full-service contracts.

Instead of renting a woman for just an hour -- as is the case with a hooker -- Real_women will offer companion services to men by the day, weekend, week, month and year. Services will be anything from providing platonic friendship, to cooking meals, to housework, to holding the post of CEO of the man's corporation, to providing sex-on-demand or full-blown kink. And yes, such arrangements will be called "marriages." If marriages can be defined in terms of upper duration (death do we part), they can be defined in terms of lower duration (day, weekend, week, month, year, etc.).

The prudes and the freaks in the Church and the State have had a monopoly on marriage for centuries and as a result over 50% of the Human Race is unhappy, if not suicidal, with the one-size-fits-all contemporary marriage arrangement.

As the 21st Century marriage arrangement matures, marriage contracts will become more and more custom tailored as far as duration, duties, responsibilities, services and choices. Women will be imported from all over the world to compete with American women and to provide American men with choice and variety. As Trump says, other countries don't send us their finest. This will truly stop when countries like Mexico, China, Germany, wherever, start sending only women who can deliver the finest blow jobs and sexual services in the world. These "carnal talents" will get fast track green cards as they flood into the U.S. providing the desperately needed services the American manufacturing base demands.

Indeed American men will not only be HARD-working, they will be hard WHILE working. One of the options in the new marriage contract will include "emergence sex service" also referred to as "on-the-job-blow-jobs" any time, any place, within 20 minutes. So let's say you're a typical hard working American male on an assembly line and you need an emergency blow job. You just call your 21st Century Wife and she will immediately come over to the factory and provide the service, no questions asked, no bitching, no demands no fumbling with hooker-type payments. Everything is automatic and already included in the marriage contract AND, your 21st Century insurance policy protects you from the risk that you might not cum. If this happens, your marriage agreements guarantees that either a Sexbot will be sent over to the factory or your "wife-swap" option will kick in.

So it's easy to see that Sexbots could initiate an entire new era of male-female relationships and even provide Real_women with some serious competition for a while. But as Sexbots improve ever more, they may also become indistinguishable from Real_women and things may change yet again. Real_women may opt to set up their own planet where Sexbots are illegal and again the Church and State may rule the day.
  





  [sign in to see URL]



Last edited by James Jaeger, 5/20/2019, 12:56 pm
5/19/2019, 2:54 pm Link to this post PM James Jaeger Blog
 


Add a reply





You are not logged in (login)
Back To Top