Runboard.com
You're welcome.

runboard.com       Sign up (learn about it) | Sign in (lost password?)

Page:  1  2  3  4 

 
James Jaeger Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user
Global user

Registered: 12-2017
Reply | Quote
SEXUAL HARASSMENT - Don't Men and Women Want to Have Sex Anymore?


Here's a truly crack pot idea: that men and women don't want to have sex with each other any more. But maybe it's not so crack pot at all given the temperament of the times.

Seems today every "news" channel has another sexual harassment "story." Yes, our lives -- our blood, sweat and tears -- are but mere "stories" for the mainstream media garbage collectors. And the "story" of sexual harassment is no different.

But what exactly is sexual harassment and what's causing it all over the land of "liberty" and "free" speech? First some background:

Men and women have existed as homo sapiens on this world for at least 200,000 years. Over this time they have managed to co-exist and expand, even though they are arguably different species. One of the main reasons they have been able to co-exist is because they like sex together. As horrifying as this claim might be to the blond bimbos and PC kiss-ass men that populate mainstream networks, Homo sapiens like to have sex and, in fact, anthropologists have recently determined that they are descended from the bonobo, not the chimp. This is significant because bonobos, unlike the chimps, are extremely promiscuous and even "hyper-sexual." In other words they like to have sex a lot.

So, given men and women are promiscuous and hypersexual by nature -- and like to have sex -- why all the sexual harassment charges these days? What's going on?

To understand what's going on, we are going to have to take a look at some more history, only this time history many of us can remember -- the Sexual Revolution. Remember that? It started in the 1960s and carried through until the AIDS outbreak starting around 1985. During the 60s, 70s, and most of the 80s everyone liked sex. Women had endless sex with men and men had endless sex with women. No one ever said "no" or "I don't want to !@#$." It was routine to have sex on the first date, and every date. DEEP THROAT and the DEVIL IN MRS JONES were playing at the local movie theaters and the cry, even the concept, of "sexual harassment" was non existent. After all, how could "sex" have anything to do with "harassment" -- a woman screaming "harassment" because the male is trying to initiate sex. Men have been doing this for the past 200,000 years? The very term would have been considered an oxymoron, even laughed off the stage.

So throughout the 60s, 70s and 80s the Sexual Revolution was being led by millions of BabyBoomers across America that loved to have sex -- what they called "free love". And no one, especially women, would even THINK of telling a man to "stop" as they wanted sex as much as men -- they WANTED to be hugged, kissed, touched, caressed and yes, fucked. At least the good-looking women did. They wanted it all. After all, one of the ways a man tells a woman she's attractive and desirable is by making sexual advances on her, both verbally and physically. Prudes and ugly woman thus want men to flirt, even "harass" them more than hotties. Given this, men, in most societies, are supposed to make the advances and initiate intimacy -- not the woman. So back in the 60s, 70s and 80s, men and women were normal and acting like normal, healthy Homo sapiens descended from bonobos are supposed to act.

Then here's what happened. The BabyBoomers started aging and became victims of life. Drugs -- especially pharmaceuticals and alcohol -- started being more widely used and thus started to take their tolls. Women started getting pregnant or had to have many abortions. Children were born in and out of wed-lock. Dads abandoned or avoided their responsibilities to raise children. The banks continued to print money out of thin air destroying the purchasing power of the dollar thus women were forced into the work force to service credit card debt. Women were then unwelcome in the work force and/or never paid as much as men. Things got worse and worse. Eventually men and women migrated from a sexual paradise of fun and little responsibility, to the living hell that we call "vanilla, work-a-day society" today -- or simply "the slaver."

Specifically, as time progressed, women slaved but began to say "no" more often. Men couldn't comprehend this word because they never really moved beyond the "yes" of the "free love" Sexual Revolution. They still wanted to have sex, but increasingly women didn't want to !@#$ quite AS much. "I don't want to get pregnant again" was often heard. Also, the phrase, "I have to get up early tomorrow to work" increasingly came up as an excuse to curb sex. Thus all-night sex sessions, so prevalent in the 60s, 70s and 80s, were increasingly rare. Yes, no one was around to !@#$ all night because everyone had to get up early and work in the slaver where the men got paid more for the same job, unless it was a blow job. Yes, when the male-dominated business world refused to pay women what they were worth -- except for paid sex and then the women are always paid as well as lawyers -- the women began to silently hate men. Not only the unfair pay for vanilla work, but women were pissed at men for screwing them and leaving them with children, then seeking out younger women who would !@#$ like in the 60s.

As this perverted version of 1960s society pervaded the nation, more and more women and men began to slowly move apart, mentally, spiritually then physically. Getting pregnant multiple times and having abortions or unwanted children didn't help -- they were real sex-stoppers for women, and rightly so. All-night sex is no longer as fun when you have to get up every morning at 7 AM to earn !@#$-money to pay credit card debt generated by asshole males in the Wall Street banking ponzi. And every woman knows deep down in her heart that these assholes were not only sexual predators, they were financial predators, and discriminating bigots.

So men and women transition from the !@#$-free 60s, 70s and 80s to an era of increasingly less "free love". Sex was no longer free. Women finally started waking up: they were going to charge men for sex in every way possible, directly and indirectly if men refused to shatter the glass ceiling AND take equal responsibility for the next generation.

In this way the war between men and woman started quietly and unannounced.

Continued below ...



Last edited by James Jaeger, 12/29/2017, 6:48 pm
12/4/2017, 10:55 pm Link to this post PM James Jaeger Blog
 
James Jaeger Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user
Global user

Registered: 12-2017
Reply | Quote
Re: SEXUAL HARASSMENT - Don't Men and Women Want to Have Sex Anymore?


Continued . . .

And this war has been escalating every decade. Women hating men and now men hating women more and more because they won't have sex. Almost every Hollywood movie and TV show depicts this trend. It has become ingrained in the culture. Women are now all over movies beating up men and men are endlessly looking at porn or dreaming about female sexbots that they can have on a first date. BabyBoomer women now do little or no dating, live single, dance with other women at the club and/or "!@#$" only lesbians or vibrators. Their motto is "I'd rather be "fucked" by a woman or dildo than a man because at least I won't get pregnant.

Some saw this war coming and started movements, such as the BDSM Movement. The philosophy here is to dramatize the changing relationship between men and women in a controlled environment in order to contain it. Almost a throwback to "Ozzie and Harriet" days, the BDSM-50 SHADES OF GRAY Movement echoes the male female relationship of the past where the male took the lead (Dominant) and the female followed (submissive). The willingness of increasing numbers of men and women willing to play the 50 shades of gray game is evidence that such are seeking the natural roles men and women have played for eons. Only there is a twist. Although the male may play the Dominant role and the female the submissive role, the domination must be earned and consensual. This is a good balance because it acknowledges the woman's contribution to the relationship yet allows each to dramatize what nature seems to have inclined them towards. The 50 Shades Movement of today probably would not have been able to flourish in the "free love" era of the 60s because there would have been no predicate of a war between the sexes that needed remedy.

But here it is today, a movement providing a forum for men and women to dramatize their "hate" for each other in a loving, socially-acceptable and highly regulated manner.

So what about the sexual harassment we hear about everyday? Well this is simply part of the war. Since women still don't seem to be able to break through the glass ceiling, and since women now realize that they control the gateways to sex -- the one commodity men seem to need and want, possibly even more than money -- it's now become socially acceptable for women to literally extort money from powerful men by accusing them of sexual harassment, improper behavior, groping, rape or pedophilia, etc. And the government and entertainment business are particularly vulnerable because the game of "sexual harassment" only works if the mass media is there to facilitate it. Some farmer who "improperly" !@#$ a woman at the local hardware store in Podunk, Iowa isn't going to garner much of a "story" let alone a settlement pay-off.

Even though men are acting the same as they did in the "free love- 60s," women have changed. They are no longer acting as they used to -- loving to !@#$ anyone and everyone -- in the "free love" era. Again, for a man to touch or ass-slap a woman's ass during the 1960s or 1970s was not only okay, it was welcomed as it showed that the male was attracted to the woman. He was only flirting. And since males and female are SUPPOSED to flirt, supposed to be attracted to each other -- at least according to 2 million years of evolution, no one in society labels such behavior as "harassment."

But today, such normal behavior is labeled not only harassment, but a "hate crime." Yes, women seem to hate men. Now they are going to get back at them for all the shitty things they did in the past and they are going to get them by politicizing sex and by getting the low-IQ people in the media and the clueless males in society to go along with it. Note how males on network TV don't dare to question any charge of sexual harassment even though the female is lying and/or withholding the fact that she really liked it and/or felt it was flattering. Or maybe not. Women today have forgotten that they used to like sex, liked !@#$ and all the stuff that lead up to it.

Or maybe women still like sex, but only with the "right person." The right person, who is that? It must be a man that submits to the woman's post-Sexual Revolution protocol. In other worlds, the females of the nation are saying to the males of the nation: "you give us equal power and financial opportunity or we are going to scream sexual harassment about anything you do that we don't like." In other words, the women of America are on a !@#$ strike.

And frankly, this author says bravo. This author has been saying for decades that women should tell the males of the planet that they refuse to !@#$ them until they stop financing and participating in wars.

STOP THE WARS OR WE WILL STOP THE !@#$.

So this is all that’s going on between men and women: they are having a little war right now. As soon as men pay women what they deserve -- equal pay -- stop getting them pregnant and then abandoning them; stop wars and a few other things -- women will start !@#$ on the first date again and they will stop calling in the dogs (males without cocks) on so-called sexual harassment charges.
12/4/2017, 10:57 pm Link to this post PM James Jaeger Blog
 
Extropia DaSilva Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Moderator
Global user

Registered: 12-2017
Reply | Quote
Re: SEXUAL HARASSMENT - Don't Men and Women Want to Have Sex Anymore?


Hiya James. I cannot speak for the other mods, but I personally do not think you need censor the word '!@#$'. You are clearly not using it in an abusive way, but rather for its literal meaning.

Anyway, there was a documentary on last week called 'Rise Of the Sex Robots', which stirred up some negative responses. I wondered why this should be. So far as I could see, the business featured (it was that Realdoll company) were catering for a basic human need. Had they been a prosthetics company making artificial hands, neither they nor their prospective clients would have been ridiculed or considered bad people for pushing for a fully-functional hand, but for some reason a fully-functional sexually-active companion seems distasteful to many. And this in spite of much evidence showing physical intimacy is something primates crave above all else. Think of those experiments where a baby chimp can choose between a cold, milk-despensing machine or a plush toy that can offer nothing but a cozy hug. They go for the plush toy every time.

Vibrators do not seem to be subject to the same condemnation, which leads me to suppose that the realdoll's ambitions are seen as a threat to power. Women can currently impose sexual starvation on men if they so choose, which is to say we can impose considerable power over the opposite sex. One day, gynoids as impressive as the most attractive women in the world- the Angelina Jolies and Scarlett Johansens- could become sex partners available to anybody. This would be a radical change in the market for sex and a serious downgrade of power to females, so perhaps it's no wonder this work is condemned?
12/5/2017, 4:11 am Link to this post PM Extropia DaSilva Blog
 
RedQ Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Moderator
Global user

Registered: 11-2017
Reply | Quote
Re: SEXUAL HARASSMENT - Don't Men and Women Want to Have Sex Anymore?


Vulgarity is almost never necessary or desirable. Certainly someone like James can think of mundane or creative alternatives. It's use here is mostly inappropriate, e.g.
quote:

Women today have forgotten that they used to like sex, liked !@#$ and all the stuff that lead up to it.

compare
quote:

Women today have forgotten that they used to like sex and all the stuff that lead up to it.



Anyway, James is cruising for a sexual harassment suit if he hits too hard on the wrong woman in the wrong place. But I agree a lot of so called sexual harassment is in service of a power play or political ideology. However, a man or woman (and I've been stalked by a woman) should only get one free pass at harassment if told in no uncertain terms to bug off.


Last edited by RedQ, 12/5/2017, 1:18 pm
12/5/2017, 1:12 pm Link to this post PM RedQ Blog
 
RedQ Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Moderator
Global user

Registered: 11-2017
Reply | Quote
Re: SEXUAL HARASSMENT - Don't Men and Women Want to Have Sex Anymore?


James, please review my message to the moderators on the Bureau sub forum. I'm sure you can contribute.

Last edited by RedQ, 12/8/2017, 8:43 pm
12/8/2017, 8:42 pm Link to this post PM RedQ Blog
 
Spikosauropod Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Parliamentarian
Global user

Registered: 06-2007
Reply | Quote
Re: SEXUAL HARASSMENT - Don't Men and Women Want to Have Sex Anymore?


This should be moved to the 24-Hour News Cycle section.

---
Spikosaur, of the Uncircumcised Umbrella, Prophet to The Collectors, OA, RMC

Hail Apostle Paul
Praise to Founder Bunny
Glory to the Objects
12/8/2017, 9:40 pm Link to this post PM Spikosauropod
 
RedQ Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Moderator
Global user

Registered: 11-2017
Reply | Quote
Re: SEXUAL HARASSMENT - Don't Men and Women Want to Have Sex Anymore?


This post represents a lot of work (or at least typing). It should be in the dog pile called MindX.

James, turn your energy to my post on the Bureau sub forum.
12/8/2017, 10:11 pm Link to this post PM RedQ Blog
 
Spikosauropod Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Parliamentarian
Global user

Registered: 06-2007
Reply | Quote
Re: SEXUAL HARASSMENT - Don't Men and Women Want to Have Sex Anymore?


James and Exy, I have read both of your arguments, and for some reason they just don't feel right.

I can see women being angry about how they are being treated personally, but they would not rebel as a group against some abstract social construct.

As James observes, it is only famous people who are being dragged through the mud. What I think is happening is that the left is desperate to bring down Donald Trump, and they feel that their best shot is to go after his sexual habits.

However, that leads to a problem. There are just too many people on the left who behave as badly or worse. So, what they are doing is "purifying" themselves. They are doing what warriors for "good" do before they battle evil. They are flagelating themselves and cutting out the eye that sinned.

Once they are certain that their own sins have been cleansed, they will go after Trump in earnest.

However, it a very bad plan. Their "purge" will destroy them before they get to Trump.

Last edited by Spikosauropod, 12/8/2017, 10:21 pm


---
Spikosaur, of the Uncircumcised Umbrella, Prophet to The Collectors, OA, RMC

Hail Apostle Paul
Praise to Founder Bunny
Glory to the Objects
12/8/2017, 10:13 pm Link to this post PM Spikosauropod
 
James Jaeger Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user
Global user

Registered: 12-2017
Reply | Quote
Re: SEXUAL HARASSMENT - Don't Men and Women Want to Have Sex Anymore?


>Hiya James.

Hi Extropia. Do you cum here often?

>I cannot speak for the other mods, but I personally do not think you need censor the word '!@#$'.

Me either, everyone DOES it, even RedQuist once every decade.

>You are clearly not using it in an abusive way, but rather for its literal meaning.

That right. I didn't say !@#$ you once to anyone.

>Anyway, there was a documentary on last week called 'Rise Of the Sex Robots', which stirred up some negative responses.

Will watch. I am in desperate need of a new sexbot.

>I wondered why this should be.

Lots of people have low libidos these days due to too much alcohol and Big Pharma.

>So far as I could see, the business featured (it was that Realdoll company) were catering for a basic human need.

Really. With all the hate, hostility and harassment going on between men and women these days, the sex robot business may boom beyond imagination. I know I would much rather date a sexbot than take my chances with a real_girl that may or may not sue me if I touch her pussy.

>Had they been a prosthetics company making artificial hands, neither they nor their prospective clients would have been ridiculed or considered bad people for pushing for a fully-functional hand, but for some reason a fully-functional sexually-active companion seems distasteful to many.

Yes, people have been fucked up by the church and state.

>And this in spite of much evidence showing physical intimacy is something primates crave above all else. Think of those experiments where a baby chimp can choose between a cold, milk-despensing machine or a plush toy that can offer nothing but a cozy hug. They go for the plush toy every time.

Right. And if it vibrates too ... what could be better?!

>Vibrators do not seem to be subject to the same condemnation, which leads me to suppose that the realdoll's ambitions are seen as a threat to power.

Speaking of. If prostitution were decriminalized -- so conservatives like RedQuist and Roy Moore could get laid once and a while -- everyone would be happier, no?

>Women can currently impose sexual starvation on men if they so choose, which is to say we can impose considerable power over the opposite sex.

Right. The point of my post -- and I'm sure you noted I don't blame the women. My only beef is that the women of the world should use a !@#$-strike for a GOOD reason -- like stopping all wars or condemning all weapon manufacturers -- not frivolous reasons (like they're in a bad-hair mood that day and don't want to be touched).

>One day, gynoids as impressive as the most attractive women in the world- the Angelina Jolies and Scarlett Johansens- could become sex partners available to anybody.

It's cumming.

>This would be a radical change in the market for sex and a serious downgrade of power to females, so perhaps it's no wonder this work is condemned?

Wheras, dark matter and dark energy are probably the only true powers in the Universe, sex and money are probably the only true powers on Earth. If this is true, women hold the power of sex and men hold the power of money.

Seems like women are now making a power play for money. The only way men will be able to counter this power play is to decriminalize prostitution.

Legal prostitution will give women the ability to have money and it will give men the ability to have sex. Each get what they want and the war is neutralized.

Right now the sex market is good for women. Since prostitution is illegal, its market value is high, just like drugs. A woman can charge as much for an hour of !@#$ as a lawyer can charge for an hour of !@#$.
 
BUT, when more women enter the market and it's inevitably decriminalized, the prices will moderate. And as SexBots are developed human women will have so much competition it will become a buyers market.

There is also the idea of skill. Due to the Internet, billions of men are getting to see various women performing various sexual skills. It is becoming obvious that some women are very talented in sex and others are very vanilla. Given this, why should a man contract for a live-in, permanent prostitute -- a marriage -- with a woman whose sexual skills are poor to mediocre. No matter how smart or educated, the man is going to opt for the women who really knows how to deliver -- just like in the movies.

So eventually the vanilla women in society will be weeded out and not reproduce. Humanity will thus continue to hyper-sexualize, as anthropologists have noted. See a book entitled, SEX AT DAWN, for details on human hyper-sexuality.
 
James



Last edited by James Jaeger, 12/14/2017, 8:53 pm
12/14/2017, 5:11 pm Link to this post PM James Jaeger Blog
 
James Jaeger Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user
Global user

Registered: 12-2017
Reply | Quote
Re: SEXUAL HARASSMENT - Don't Men and Women Want to Have Sex Anymore?


RedQuist Wrote:
>Vulgarity is almost never necessary or desirable.

Jaeger wrote:

True, but it's a lot more fun.

>Certainly someone like James can think of mundane or creative alternatives.

I can if I really wanted to take the trouble.
Actually I cleaned up the OP considerably before posting here. I wrote this originally for a sex site -- you know a site where people like to !@#$.

>It's use here is mostly inappropriate, e.g.
quote: Women today have forgotten that they used to like sex, liked !@#$ and all the stuff that lead up to it.

Originally that sentence read: "Women today have forgotten that they used to like to !@#$ -- and all the stuff that lead up to it."

The word !@#$ is appropriate because we're not talking about "making love". Making love is different from !@#$. Making love is what men and women do BEFORE they have kids and "!@#$" is what they do after kids -- and/or 20 years of marriage.
 
>Compare: Women today have forgotten that they used to like sex and all the stuff that lead up to it.

Yes, I considered this. But though it was boring and didn't really explain the situation. I repeat: I cleaned up this post considerably. Almost every place you see the word "sex" we originally the word "!@#$."

>Anyway, James is cruising for a sexual harassment suit if he hits too hard on the wrong woman in the wrong place.

Actually ReqQuist, I was raised to understand that women are to be respected and a man does not place his grubby hands on her unless it's obvious she WANTS him to. Given this I'm not too worried.

And as far as using language that some attempt to censor, show me where in the Constitution it says WE THE PEOPLE can't use whatever !@#$ words we want in a free-speech nation.

>But I agree a lot of so called sexual harassment is in service of a power play or political ideology.

Well a guy like Harvey Weinstein who is used to hearing women say yes, will not tolerate a woman saying no to his advances. This is just arrogant, perverted abuse of power and the women of the world should go after men like this as much as they want -- not men that say !@#$.
  
>However, a man or woman (and I've been stalked by a woman) should only get one free pass at harassment if told in no uncertain terms to bug off.

True. But the woman should be clear about any unwanted advances, and it wouldn't hurt for her to be polite as well. After all, in many/most cases the guy is just trying to show his affinity for her. Many guys are awkward and have a very hard time with this. If the woman is snooty or mean, she may in fact precipitate the very harassment she seeks to escape.

When I studied criminology at University of Pennsylvania, many studies posited that most crime is "victim-precipitated" however the PC Left has been trying to erase those studies from the books.

James
12/14/2017, 5:29 pm Link to this post PM James Jaeger Blog
 


Add a reply

Page:  1  2  3  4 





You are not logged in (login)
Back To Top