Runboard.com
Слава Україні!

runboard.com       Sign up (learn about it) | Sign in (lost password?)

 
James Jaeger Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 12-2017
Reply | Quote
WAR CAUSES MORE WAR...


Does it?
10/12/2019, 12:35 pm Link to this post PM James Jaeger Blog
 
James Jaeger Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 12-2017
Reply | Quote
Re: WAR CAUSES MORE WAR...


No comments means it does obviously ...
10/12/2019, 2:52 pm Link to this post PM James Jaeger Blog
 
richiemobile Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Moderator

Registered: 12-2017
Reply | Quote
Re: WAR CAUSES MORE WAR...


When you have a military industrial complex with a million employees, the most aircraft carriers, the most advanced aircraft and drone technology and you have been the world’s only superpower for 30/years, you are going to go to war every 35 to 40 years so the authority of experience of war trickles down to the next generations. War is an industry plain and simple
10/13/2019, 6:00 am Link to this post PM richiemobile Blog
 
James Jaeger Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 12-2017
Reply | Quote
Re: WAR CAUSES MORE WAR...


You are absolutely right Richie, however I was asking more of a philosophical question: what causes war?

We are all told that A must fight B in a so-called "war" because of reasons 1, 2, 3, 4 ... In otherwords, a war must be highly justified by "reasons" and such reasons must be morally rationalized using the special term "just war." So the idea is: some moral or ethical "reason" is so compelling that state-santioned murder and slaughter of human life is now ok. Even God wants the war.

But here's the flaw in humanity's logic:

Because A is killing babies and eating them we need to go blow up A in the name of "baby protection" or some other good. Ony one one millionth of the population is actually eating the babies, but they are a part of Group A so they need to be blown up. And all this makes "sense" to the animal-level mind of current homo sap: stop the baby eating by slaughtering all possible baby eaters in Group A. Wipe out all of Hitler's baby eaters on the planet.

The problem is, even though 100 babies got eaten by Group A, and it was a terrible thing, a WAR is now in progress. Now 1 million fully grown babies will be slaughtered and none of these fully grown babies will ever have any new babies. So Homo Sap entered into a "just war -- sanctioned by God himself -- and now 1 million people will never have any babies. Homo sap saved 100 babies but erased from existence 1 million babies -- any one of which might have developed plasma fusion or free energy technology of the the world.

But further, that "war to end all baby eating" was not easy. One thousand cities had to be demolished. After all baby eaters can hide everywhere. Yes, the Baby Eater War, as it is now known as, caused so much damage in human resources, property and infrastructure, that the war's victims have now become the WARD OF THE WORLD. What does this mean, ward of the world? It means YOU are now going to have to take care of these people. YOU are going to have to PAY for these people whether YOU like it or not and no matter WHERE you live on the interconnected planet. Since YOUR government claims the moral high-ground -- that it's above baby eating -- and that it only enters "just wars" -- as God permits -- surely YOU will now easily submit to more and more taxes so that YOUR government can set up Marshall Plans all over the planet to take care or ex-Baby Eater Grouls who have been slaughtered by YOUR military madcine to end wars and baby eating. YOU ARE GOING TO PAY, and you are going to pay for every war that has happened and that will endlessly happen as a result of YOU saving 100 babies 1,00 years ago in the First Baby Eating War.

And if YOU do not pay for the current war and give those 1 million slaughtered baby eating citizens from Group A the ability to survive, they will spend the rest of their lives and the lives of their babies, overtly or covertly seeking to GET you back. That's right, they will start another war to GET you, the !@#$ that killed THEM for alegidly eating babies. And they will never admit that they were the ones that ate, or started eating, Babies. They will tell their children that it was YOU that started started it, YOU that started eating babies and THEY were the ones sho started the "just war" to stop YOU, or stop something YOU were doing that was even worse than eating Babies.

So what we have -- like it or not -- is endless planetary "he said-she said" scenarios going on, each one escallated by another "war to end the wars" -- when in fact every just war CAUSES yet more JUST WARS and all are JUSTIFIED by some imaginary being in the sky or some profiteer's mind.

In short, Homo Sap uses violence to "justify" and solve his problems because he fails to see or understand that his violence causes more violence, endlessly. In otherwords: WAR CAUSES WAR.




Last edited by James Jaeger, 10/13/2019, 9:54 am
10/13/2019, 9:29 am Link to this post PM James Jaeger Blog
 
greendocnowciv Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info



Registered: 11-2017
Reply | Quote
Re: WAR CAUSES MORE WAR...


A reasonable, very defendable case.

Meantime - here we are, in 2019. We're on top.

President Trump is slowly, in fits and starts, pulling back from war in Syria and Afghanistan, though still in both.

But! He still runs a massive military footprint planted all over Earth - and now Space!

And I assure you - the sea.

Should we pull it all back into CONUS?

Mebbe. For now, a lot of pull-back is clearly a good idea. But all? Various things are debatable, so I wouldn't say "all."


10/13/2019, 10:13 am Link to this post PM greendocnowciv Blog
 
James Jaeger Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 12-2017
Reply | Quote
Re: WAR CAUSES MORE WAR...


>A reasonable, very defendable case.

Thanks.

>Meantime - here we are, in 2019. We're on top.

Hopefully.

>President Trump is slowly, in fits and starts, pulling back from war in Syria and Afghanistan, though still in both.

Yes. We must get out of all these wars. No one said it will be easy. Again, war causes the complications of war, even when there is "peace" there is really no peace in everyones minds.

>But! He still runs a massive military footprint planted all over Earth - and now Space!

True. Seems inconsistant - the idea of getting out of wars yet allocating an eatra $720 billion to build up the war machine.
I suppose it's all in the name of deterrent.

Frankly I don't like the idea of "deterrents" any more. I'm waiting for the Human race to use REASON as their deterrent.

WARS ALWAYS CREATE A NEGATIVE CASH FLOW FOR THE PLANET.

I do not buy the myth that wars create new technology and cause advancement. They cause agvancement in the wrong direction. They cause advancement in the direction of hate and violence and surveillance.

I want a planet where the act of war never happens. Where humans use thought and fair play to figure out how to allocate resources.

>And I assure you - the sea.

?

>Should we pull it all back into CONUS?

?

>Mebbe. For now, a lot of pull-back is clearly a good idea. But all? Various things are debatable, so I wouldn't say "all."

Why do we need to be entangled in the Middle East? Answer: to protect Isreal under the guise of protecting oil. This is why an alternative to oil will never be financed hence invented. This is why we will not have fusion or real solar until the Answer is different.
10/13/2019, 4:24 pm Link to this post PM James Jaeger Blog
 


Add a reply





You are not logged in (login)
Back To Top