Re: WHAT WILL HAPPEN NEXT - Wednesday the 6th and 20th TITLE 10, Chapter 13
Section 252 and 253
Section 252 -- formerly the Insurrection Act of 1807 -- is what Trump should have used to suppress the riots in Portland and what he should be using now to suppress the fraud at the voting booths.
Section 253 was used to protect Black Americans from the KKK when they tried to vote. Back then the KKK wore white clothes but today's KKK, known as Antifa, wears black clothes, and suppresses Trump voters.
Re: WHAT WILL HAPPEN NEXT - Wednesday the 6th and 20th
quote:
Well, James, if in the future more evidence is REVEALED, and furthermore if it is not only Trump and his band of cynical cronies and fanatical followers who are making these claims but voices outside of this partisan group, THEN I might take it seriously. For now, though, I deem what ‘evidence’ there is to be about as persuasive as claims that there is an aquatic dinosaur called Nessie living in a Scottish Loch.
Unbelievable cognitive dissonance coming for you and your crowd, Extropia, on so many levels.
Re: WHAT WILL HAPPEN NEXT - Wednesday the 6th and 20th So are we making official predictions about the 20th?
Here's mine: Biden will be inaugurated on the 20th. Perhaps there will be protests, perhaps there will be another insurrection, but Biden will still be inaugurated. Then we'll all move on with our lives, although a healthy chunk of Republicans will continue to whine that the election was stolen while never proving anything meaningful.
Re: WHAT WILL HAPPEN NEXT - Wednesday the 6th and 20th Lou Dobbs reported that Trump has declassified a foot-high sheath of documents regarding the Clintons and other matters.
My understanding is this is just the first of a number of data dumps to come in the next days. Some of this data may come from Assange, who Trump is said to pardon.
This declassified information -- along with forensic data on the election fraud -- could be enough to effectuate an interregnum. Fasten your seat belt.
I've noticed a pattern that I expect to see over and over again with this sort of video. They claim that they're only using objective data, and that they have a way of conclusively determining proof of fraud... but they just need more information/ballots/machines/etc. For some reason, the proof is always just out of reach. When I see that pattern repeated over and over again, it suggests to me that people are relying on the gaps to justify their pre-existing narrative.
Re: WHAT WILL HAPPEN NEXT - Wednesday the 6th and 20th
quote:
James Jaeger wrote:
Do you know this for sure on this guy?
I can't say one way or the other whether he's credible, but he seems intelligent. His methodology makes sense on the surface, but it doesn't actually make any claims about fraud, just that if this specific kind of fraud took place, he thinks that he can prove it... If he only had more evidence.
