Spikosauropod
Parliamentarian
Registered: 06-2007
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Artificial Intelligence and I Discuss What Happened Before the Big Bang
Wise Being: If we were to speculate on what might have triggered this event, it would have to be another organism.
Kirk Ouimet: Please explain.
Wise Being: The Big Bang is an event which is absolute and the only possible “creator” capable of conceiving of the Big Bang is also absolute. The only possible candidate for something that satisfies the definition of absolute is another being who is also absolute. Absolute cannot be manifested by non-absolute because to define something as absolute is to make a definition devoid of being contingent on external entities.
|
9/15/2020, 10:35 pm
|
Link to this post
PM Spikosauropod
|
Papa Guinea Pig
Registered user
Registered: 11-2017
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Artificial Intelligence and I Discuss What Happened Before the Big Bang
Fantastic!
|
9/16/2020, 7:23 am
|
Link to this post
PM Papa Guinea Pig
Blog
|
Spikosauropod
Parliamentarian
Registered: 06-2007
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Artificial Intelligence and I Discuss What Happened Before the Big Bang
This concept of an "absolute creator being" sounds curiously familiar.
|
9/16/2020, 9:13 am
|
Link to this post
PM Spikosauropod
|
Extropia DaSilva
Moderator
Registered: 12-2017
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Artificial Intelligence and I Discuss What Happened Before the Big Bang
The AI should at least be given credit for moving Big Bang theory out of science and into theology where it originated and where it belongs.
|
9/16/2020, 11:49 am
|
Link to this post
PM Extropia DaSilva
Blog
|
Animecat
Registered user
Registered: 12-2017
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Artificial Intelligence and I Discuss What Happened Before the Big Bang
quote: Spikosauropod wrote:
This concept of an "absolute creator being" sounds curiously familiar.
Two infinitely small, indivisible dots create a fractal interference pattern.
https://math.wikia.org/wiki/User:Gjeremy
|
9/19/2020, 6:25 pm
|
Link to this post
|
Spikosauropod
Parliamentarian
Registered: 06-2007
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Artificial Intelligence and I Discuss What Happened Before the Big Bang
quote: Extropia DaSilva wrote:
The AI should at least be given credit for moving Big Bang theory out of science and into theology where it originated and where it belongs.
The Big Bang theory comes from the most straight-forward empirical observation possible. A bunch of stuff is moving rapidly apart, so it was probably originally together.
|
9/19/2020, 8:21 pm
|
Link to this post
PM Spikosauropod
|
Extropia DaSilva
Moderator
Registered: 12-2017
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Artificial Intelligence and I Discuss What Happened Before the Big Bang
Many observations of highly redshifted quasi-stellar objects physically connected to or in front of low-redshifted galaxies throws serious doubt on the reliability of redshift as an indicator of an expanding universe.
If the empirical data matched Big Bang theory, Big Bang theorists would not need to fudge their equations in order to get the model to match contradictory observations quite so much.
The Big Bang remains bunk and the fact that this AI does not understand this just provides more proof of ‘garbage in, garbage out’.
|
9/19/2020, 11:47 pm
|
Link to this post
PM Extropia DaSilva
Blog
|
Spikosauropod
Parliamentarian
Registered: 06-2007
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Artificial Intelligence and I Discuss What Happened Before the Big Bang
There are many indications of the distance of a cosmological object. These indications are cross-referenced. I will wager that you cannot find a reputable peer reviewed paper that suggests redshift is not a good indication of an object travelling away. There are more than a lot of reasons why your quackstrology theory is rejected by legitimate science.
|
9/20/2020, 1:14 am
|
Link to this post
PM Spikosauropod
|
Extropia DaSilva
Moderator
Registered: 12-2017
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Artificial Intelligence and I Discuss What Happened Before the Big Bang
But it isn’t rejected by legitimate science. Plasma cosmology papers are accepted for publication in peer-reviewed plasma physics journals. Which is appropriate, given that those are the experts qualified to judge the validity of such ideas.
In 1976, editors of the Astrophysics journal published a paper by an astronomer called William Tifft. This paper was the result of many years of astronomical observation which showed that redshift is quantised. This was yet another ‘crisis’ for the Big Bang theory, since it predicts that the redshift of all galaxies together should form a random distribution. As science writer Dava Sobel commented, “It is not at all clear...how quantised redshifts would be compatible in an expanding universe”.
The Big Bang remains bunk:)
|
9/20/2020, 11:56 pm
|
Link to this post
PM Extropia DaSilva
Blog
|
Spikosauropod
Parliamentarian
Registered: 06-2007
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Artificial Intelligence and I Discuss What Happened Before the Big Bang
quote: Plasma cosmology papers are accepted for publication in peer-reviewed plasma physics journals.
OMG, it's hopeless! Quackstrology has become communal solipsism...and I can't save you because you are a dissociated "primary" across a continent and an ocean! Alas, Extropia, I knew her well...
|
9/21/2020, 12:58 am
|
Link to this post
PM Spikosauropod
|