Runboard.com
Слава Україні!

runboard.com       Sign up (learn about it) | Sign in (lost password?)

Page:  1  2  3  4  5 

 
James Jaeger Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 12-2017
Reply | Quote
Re: Two Possible Film Projects


>This is a better and more provocative title. Also a snapshot of the film outlined

Yes, you are spot on Richie.

The emerging facts indicate that homo sapiens is not only promiscuous by nature, but hypersexual. If this is true, it means the institution of marriage -- which forces monogamy upon human beings and then punishes them for not being something that they are not -- is cruel and unusual.

Same for the state that arrogates upon itself the "right" to deny men and women the right to charge for sex -- thus abetting the crime of monogamy.

It's very similar to the gay rights movement. If you are biologically gay -- just like everyone is biologically promiscuous and hypersexual -- and you do not conform to societies view of the way your libido should be, then you are an outcast. Or you are the victim of sex used as a political weapon like Eliot Spitzer and the politician in the movie ZIPPER, starring Richard Dreyfus.

I would think the gay rights movement, as well as any minority that feels sexually oppressed, would champion a film that takes a serious look at our totally dysfunctional society when it comes to the issues contemplated by the proposed film. See Synopsis and Outline above.


Last edited by James Jaeger, 7/2/2020, 1:08 pm
7/2/2020, 11:54 am Link to this post PM James Jaeger Blog
 
James Jaeger Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 12-2017
Reply | Quote
Re: HYPERSEXUAL & SICK -- two films NOT Coming a Theater Near You


It's a little worrisome that the only two people to post here on these vitally important films are the gay guy and the film guy.

I guess we'll soon be taking over the planet too...



7/2/2020, 1:01 pm Link to this post PM James Jaeger Blog
 
James Jaeger Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 12-2017
Reply | Quote
Re: HYPERSEXUAL & SICK -- two films NOT Coming a Theater Near You


Checking Internet Movie Data Base for title HYPERSEXUAL only one movie with this title comes up:

HYPERSEXUAL - a short. "A recovering sex addict battles depression while trying to survive her first 30 days of abstinence."

Not how this movie is sex-negative. The movie makes sex an addiction that someone has to "recover" from.

See the perverted spin movies and society put on sex -- nature's purest, most natural drug.

But chopping off people heads and drugging them to suicide, all that's positive.






Last edited by James Jaeger, 7/2/2020, 1:25 pm
7/2/2020, 1:19 pm Link to this post PM James Jaeger Blog
 
James Jaeger Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 12-2017
Reply | Quote
Re: HYPERSEXUAL & SICK -- two films NOT Coming a Theater Near You


Then checking imdb for title PROMISCUOUS, this one movie comes up:

"Debbie has a perfect date with Dean. The night went so well that she spent the night with him. Dean has a wondering eye. One woman is not enough for him. When Regina wants a second date, Dean has moved on to the next woman, and the next."

Note the sex-negativity again, i.e. "One woman is not enough for him ... Dean has moved on to the next woman, and the next."

The idea is Dean must submit to monogamy and the societal dictate that "one woman" should be enough. Were this movie not sex-negative the blurb would have read:


"Debbie has a perfect date with Dean. The night went so well that she spent the night with him. Dean, appreciating the sex he had with Debbie, and how good he made her feel, feels obligated to sleep with Regina, and then Terry, and then Jen. Taking all he learned form these women, Dean sleeps with Debbie again and makes her have even more orgasm than they did on their first date. Debbie can't believe how great Dean made her feel so she gives him her younger sister's phone number and begs him to call her..."


Get the idea? The sick, limp-cock, church-brainwashed society sells films that imply sex is dirty and wrong or some sort of a malady -- in a word, sex-negative. Even the Hollywood movie industry fails to get sex right in light of our true natures.

And the fact that only the gay guy and the film guy are here commenting on this is almost proof I am hitting close to home for many of YOU who dare to read this but do not dare to chime in.










Last edited by James Jaeger, 7/2/2020, 1:38 pm
7/2/2020, 1:34 pm Link to this post PM James Jaeger Blog
 
RedQ Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Moderatorₗ

Registered: 11-2017
Reply | Quote
Re: HYPERSEXUAL & SICK -- two films NOT Coming a Theater Near You


Do a movie on Q. Nobody has although PrayingMedic (Dan something) wrote a book.

Q's a large cultural phenomena that many people are unfamiliar with. Although the MSM frequently bash Q as just an "alt-right conspiracy theory" they spend a lot of ink on him and never, ever, ask Trump if Q is for real.

Suggested title: "The Deepest Conspiracy Theory: Trump Tweets, Q Leaks".

I think it's the most fascinating topic extant.

A major theme of Q is that many of our major leaders and shakers are sex obsessed, particularly with minors. They abuse and kill kids and drink their blood as part of Satanic Rituals.

If you can't make hay out of that James, go back to film school.

But watch out. If you are brave enough to look hard at this, you'll enter the rabbit hole.

P.S. You've really sold out to the tyranny around here. This should be in MindX. I'm sure the power brokers approve of you bending a knee.

Last edited by RedQ, 7/2/2020, 4:59 pm
7/2/2020, 4:57 pm Link to this post PM RedQ Blog
 
James Jaeger Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 12-2017
Reply | Quote
Re: HYPERSEXUAL & SICK -- two films NOT Coming a Theater Near You


RedQuist -- I'm sure Q is a very interesting topic, but I'm burned out on politics. I made 10 movies in an attempt to give conservatives a voice in the movie industry and how did they reward or even acknowledge the effort? With the barest of support. I even had a heart attack.

Last edited by James Jaeger, 7/3/2020, 11:56 am
7/3/2020, 11:55 am Link to this post PM James Jaeger Blog
 
greendocnowciv Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info



Registered: 11-2017
Reply | Quote
Re: Two Possible Film Projects NOT Coming a Theater Near You


I'm sure you're doing what you think best for your ongoing heart health - good luck to you.

And that long, strong effort to make an impact on politics may end up more impactful than it seems now.

It's clear that at least here, you've impacted several of us with those vids. I and others will certainly urge others to watch them.

And glad that you're branching out.

One Q: Why do you consider me "a film guy?" I don't mind that, just curious.

7/3/2020, 1:27 pm Link to this post PM greendocnowciv Blog
 
RedQ Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Moderatorₗ

Registered: 11-2017
Reply | Quote
Re: Two Possible Film Projects NOT Coming a Theater Near You


Sorry to hear about the heart, James. Hope you are recovering well and everything is copacetic.
7/3/2020, 1:28 pm Link to this post PM RedQ Blog
 
James Jaeger Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 12-2017
Reply | Quote
Re: Two Possible Film Projects NOT Coming a Theater Near You


Thank you Green, I appreciate the sentiments re the films.

By film guy I was referring to myself, Richie and myself.

If I do the film on the medical system that would be the safe bet. I would confront the usual conservative, stingy, a-sexual, deus-ex-machina, hypocritical, perverted statist donors that barely gave a !@#$. But I would somehow get through it and it might be a film with merit even though I would probably have another heart attack making it.

On the other hand, I could step out and make a film that will probably not be funded by any of my perverted, conservative donors that pretend sex is evil while they look at porn and masturbate over teenage girls getting ass-fucked while being collar and leash choked.

In other words my covertly promiscuous, hypersexual conservative donors will not lift a finger to make EITHER film so I might as well make THE film that is least likely to give me another heart attack.

Ironically, my technical director told me yesterday I may get more money than I can imagine for a film on male-female relationships as kinky millionaires and billionaires may covertly fund such a film with abandon. After all, what establishment filmmaker or studio on the right OR the left has ever made a film that was not in someway sex-negative hence exploitive of sex? The way Hollywood positions sex in its movies is always exploitive. Oh look at that girl's naked body -- buy a ticked she's naked. Or look at that husband, he cheated on his wife after 30 years because no one in the world is promiscuous but him.

This is all sex-negative as it USES sex -- nature's most joyous phenomenon -- to base stories of chastity upon. In other words, instead of celebrating human sexuality, Hollywood commercializes it and then draws moral conclusions that conform with societies false interpretations of human nature. The promiscuous or hypersexual person in the movie is always the "flawed" character. You are "flawed" if you like sex too much, are promiscuous or hypersexual. The "flawed" person must thus always go through the character arch to become the "moral" person that is "sexually correct" for church/state-perverted society.

Hey, maybe that's a title

SEXUALLY-CORRECT: Can Men and Women Build a Better Future?

Actually SEXUALLY INCORRECT would be better.


Richie, thoughts?



 



    



Last edited by James Jaeger, 7/4/2020, 1:48 pm
7/3/2020, 2:52 pm Link to this post PM James Jaeger Blog
 
James Jaeger Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 12-2017
Reply | Quote
Re: Two Possible Film Projects NOT Coming a Theater Near You


>Sorry to hear about the heart, James. Hope you are recovering well and everything is copacetic.

Thanks for the sentiments RedQ. I am back to 100%, actually more as the blockage in one of my arteries has been cleared and I am on a better diet.

  
7/4/2020, 3:15 pm Link to this post PM James Jaeger Blog
 


Add a reply

Page:  1  2  3  4  5 





You are not logged in (login)
Back To Top