Runboard.com
You're welcome.

runboard.com       Sign up (learn about it) | Sign in (lost password?)

Page:  1  2  3 

 
James Jaeger Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user
Global user

Registered: 12-2017
Reply | Quote
SINGLE FEMALE CELEBRITIES -- Why Be Dependent on a Male


This is strong evidence that women couple up with men just for their resources. If a woman is a rich celebrity, why should she bother to be hassled with a relationship -- especially with a male?


Celebrities are Still Single

Last edited by TheInvisibleHand, 9/10/2019, 1:38 pm
9/10/2019, 10:09 am Link to this post PM James Jaeger Blog
 
Spikosauropod Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Parliamentarian
Global user

Registered: 06-2007
Reply | Quote
Re: SINGLE FEMALE CELEBRITIES -- Why Be Dependent on a Male


But this article is not just about women. It includes men who do not marry or remarry.

---
Spikosaur, of the Uncircumcised Umbrella, Prophet to The Collectors, OA, RMC

Hail Apostle Paul
Praise to Founder Bunny
Glory to the Objects
9/10/2019, 1:47 pm Link to this post PM Spikosauropod
 
James Jaeger Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user
Global user

Registered: 12-2017
Reply | Quote
Re: SINGLE FEMALE CELEBRITIES -- Why Be Dependent on a Male


Principle still applies. By sharing expenses, two can live for less than one. A female -- or male -- who is of means can more easily afford to live single.

The cultural Marxist-infested society that is now saturated with fiat currency-driven debt strives to break up family units because if he lives here and she lives there, there will be two sets of consumer-debt slaves feeding the parasitic economy rather than one.

Last edited by James Jaeger, 9/10/2019, 2:30 pm
9/10/2019, 2:29 pm Link to this post PM James Jaeger Blog
 
Spikosauropod Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Parliamentarian
Global user

Registered: 06-2007
Reply | Quote
Re: SINGLE FEMALE CELEBRITIES -- Why Be Dependent on a Male


You blame cultural Marxist-infested society saturated with fiat currency-driven debt. I blame ordinary selfishness. Nowadays, there are funner things to do than raise a family and our culture tolerates remaining single.

--Log in or sign up to see linked image content--

---
Spikosaur, of the Uncircumcised Umbrella, Prophet to The Collectors, OA, RMC

Hail Apostle Paul
Praise to Founder Bunny
Glory to the Objects
9/10/2019, 3:12 pm Link to this post PM Spikosauropod
 
James Jaeger Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user
Global user

Registered: 12-2017
Reply | Quote
Re: SINGLE FEMALE CELEBRITIES -- Why Be Dependent on a Male


That's exactly what cultural Marxism exploits: ordinary selfishness.

9/10/2019, 4:31 pm Link to this post PM James Jaeger Blog
 
Spikosauropod Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Parliamentarian
Global user

Registered: 06-2007
Reply | Quote
Re: SINGLE FEMALE CELEBRITIES -- Why Be Dependent on a Male


Your sure is isn't just skiing, biking, saunas, TV, VR,..., free love, Kayaking, Internet, limitless free pornography, and whatever this is:

--Log in or sign up to see linked image content--

---
Spikosaur, of the Uncircumcised Umbrella, Prophet to The Collectors, OA, RMC

Hail Apostle Paul
Praise to Founder Bunny
Glory to the Objects
9/10/2019, 7:22 pm Link to this post PM Spikosauropod
 
Spikosauropod Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Parliamentarian
Global user

Registered: 06-2007
Reply | Quote
Re: SINGLE FEMALE CELEBRITIES -- Why Be Dependent on a Male


When this takes off it is going to kill marriage...

--Log in or sign up to see linked image content--

...and make lots of widows!

---
Spikosaur, of the Uncircumcised Umbrella, Prophet to The Collectors, OA, RMC

Hail Apostle Paul
Praise to Founder Bunny
Glory to the Objects
9/10/2019, 7:28 pm Link to this post PM Spikosauropod
 
James Jaeger Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user
Global user

Registered: 12-2017
Reply | Quote
Re: SINGLE FEMALE CELEBRITIES -- Why Be Dependent on a Male


So why is the divorce rate so high? Over 50% by some estimates. If skiing, biking, saunas, TV, VR, free love, Kayaking, Internet, limitless free pornography and whatever are so apealing, why did this "over 50%" get married in the first place?

It's obvious to me that you haven't studied cultural Marxism, especially one of its three key techniques known as Androgyny. Rember, one of the 10 planks of Communism is the destruction of the family unit. The family unit is the building block of the Middle Class and the Middle Class is the engine of a capitalist society -- the enemy of Marxism.

Androgyny accomplishes the destruction of the family unit in a number of ways but the most basic way is by making men into women and women into men. In otherwords confusing the roles of men and women so that the traditional family, especially the patriarchal family, is undermined and destroyed. Divorce.

Rather than my explaining it all here, why don't you just watch the movie CULTURAL MARXISM and book up on the subject so you know what's going on.

   

 




Last edited by James Jaeger, 9/10/2019, 9:47 pm
9/10/2019, 9:43 pm Link to this post PM James Jaeger Blog
 
Spikosauropod Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Parliamentarian
Global user

Registered: 06-2007
Reply | Quote
Re: SINGLE FEMALE CELEBRITIES -- Why Be Dependent on a Male


But this is your own film. You will be telling me again what you just told me. If you want me to watch a nearly 2 hour video, you need to convince me a bit more.

Curiously, a web page that considers cultural Marxism to be a wild conspiracy has the best explanation of it:

quote:

The theory holds that these self-interested Jews — the so-called "Frankfurt School" of philosophers — planned to try to convince mainstream Americans that white ethnic pride is bad, that sexual liberation is good, and that supposedly traditional American values — Christianity, "family values," and so on — are reactionary and bigoted. With their core values thus subverted, the theory goes, Americans would be quick to sign on to the ideas of the far left.
[sign in to see URL]


I actually agree that all of that is being done. I don't see the need for the antisemitic aspect. Evan Sayet has a perfect explanstion for the push to destroy traditional values, and it is not antisemitic. Is your video antisemitic?

---
Spikosaur, of the Uncircumcised Umbrella, Prophet to The Collectors, OA, RMC

Hail Apostle Paul
Praise to Founder Bunny
Glory to the Objects
9/10/2019, 10:03 pm Link to this post PM Spikosauropod
 
James Jaeger Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user
Global user

Registered: 12-2017
Reply | Quote
Re: SINGLE FEMALE CELEBRITIES -- Why Be Dependent on a Male


>But this is your own film. You will be telling me again what you just told me. If you want me to watch a nearly 2 hour video, you need to convince me a bit more.


Spike, I interviewed Pat Buchanan for this and no one explains Cultural Marxism better than he. If you are afraid you may get too big a dose of me, just fast forward through the narration and listen to the experts.

>Curiously, a web page that considers cultural Marxism to be a wild conspiracy has the best explanation of it:

It's not a theory when there are scores of books written by members and professors of the Institute for Social Research. It's public domain academia.

>quote: The theory holds that these self-interested Jews — the so-called "Frankfurt School" of philosophers —

I never mention that many of the leading lights were Jewish. Watch the film, Jews are not mentioned.

>planned to try to convince mainstream Americans that white ethnic pride is bad, that sexual liberation is good, and that supposedly traditional American values — Christianity, "family values," and so on — are reactionary and bigoted. With their core values thus subverted, the theory goes, Americans would be quick to sign on to the ideas of the far left.
[sign in to see URL]

This is a good explanation. I agree. Except they weren't just self-interested people, this was an organized spinoff group from Marx's political and economic Marxism.

>I actually agree that all of that is being done.

Yes, it's become quite obvious now and can be the only explanation for the left-leaning academia, media and even clergy.

>I don't see the need for the antisemitic aspect.

I don't either and that's why I didn't mention Jews in the movies. I realize Marx was Jewish so many of his followers would naturally be Jewish as well. But if Marx was a Scientologist or Christian, many of his followers would be Scientologists or Christians.

So it's not important WHO is doing this, all that's important is WHAT is being done. This is an intellectual battle not a racial battle.

>Evan Sayet has a perfect explanstion for the push to destroy traditional values, and it is not antisemitic. Is your video antisemitic?

It's just anti-Marxist ideology, which includes socialism capitalism and even fascism. Anti collectivism, as Ed Griffin might put it.
9/11/2019, 12:34 pm Link to this post PM James Jaeger Blog
 


Add a reply

Page:  1  2  3 





You are not logged in (login)
Back To Top